Justin Edwards asked me if I would post this message for him.
This morning Rob Moshein published the above document in response to my accusing him of lying about my friend, Oma Hamou not being convicted of the crime of FRAUD in the state of Utah. First, this document provides incorrect data. Also it does not say my friend was convicted of the crime of fraud but rather she was charged with the felony crime of Fraud. The truth of the matter is my friend, Oma plead guilty in 1992 for writing a bad check while on the run from a violent marriage. No where in her conviction from that state does it say fraud.
Had my friend's then husband, Marcus Demian kept his word as outlined in the letters he had his then attorney prepare and sent to the courts in Montana and Utah my friend, Oma Hamou would have never been convicted of any crime.
As Mike Newson has pointed out, when one continues to find error in Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein's research on so many points one has to feel that these errors are intentional. That they ignored the facts, and continue to deny that they have made mistakes in spite of their knowledge that they have made these mistakes --- as plenty of people have told them they have errors and we are aware of the many times that they have visited Oma Hamou's site where this was first published, and where it has many times hosted posts that refuted their conclusions, one has to wonder about their intent to see truth dispensed or if their intent is to bring humiliation and harm to Oma.
I want to know why Rob Moshein an experienced attorney felt it wasn't necessary to verify whether this document contained correct information?
I ask on a personal note why since 2003 Rob Moshein & his life partner continously list debts which are purported to belong to my friend?
I can only think of one reason, that being they want to humilate my friend, rub her nose in it because they believe she is dirt, a dog and as Rob himself has published on the web, she is NOTHING and it is a feeling shared by Pallasart & Bob Atchison. I can say these people and entity believes my friend is dirt, a dog based on their actions towards her since 2000. Bob Atchison sent the US State Department a lists of debts he claimed belonged to my friend because he believed sincerely this would validate his story about my friend Oma Hamou. It did not. The US State Department did not believe Bob Atchison's story about my friend Oma Hamou. It did not tell Bob Atchison they would contact the US Embassy in Moscow to warn it about crimes which Bob Atchison said my friend was involved in with regards to her film project. Bob Atchison also told the US State department my friend conned a Russian Monk Father Markell into getting a loan with JP Morgan and took the money and didn't do what she promised. This was and is an egragious lie -- a lie which was verified as being just that, a lie told by a man who is on a mission to destroy a woman's reputation and career because he felt she was a threat to his imagined status of importance.
I notice Rob Moshein has not given me permission to list his THEN debts pulled from his CREDIT REPORT nor has he given me permission to list what kind of a car he drives or any other information found about him yet this man who dubs himself the Austin Wine Guy -- Rob Moshein is ENTITLED to do this to my friend.
The debts he lists some of them say in excess of $10,000 while others purported debts list such as BOARDRUSH a company whose friendship with Bob Atchison and his web design company Pallasart states my friend owes in excess of $200,000.
My friend, Oma Hamou contends this company obtained a judgment against her fraudulently. She maintains they did nothing for her film project or her company. The people at World Monuments Fund wrote in a letter on her behalf this company did not negotiate any contract between them and my friend's company.
As to the judgment FRAUDULENTLY obtained by Rob Moshein's life partner, Bob Atchison it is a debt my friend swears she will NEVER PAY TO THIS MAN, those are her words not mine.
Let me show why she believes this debt obtained by Bob Atchison against her was done fraudulently:
Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.
ONE YEAR BEFORE
Both Bob Atchison and his Then Attorney committed perjury at trial during his lawsuit with Oma Hamou let's read what Bob Atchison's then Attorney had to say to the court:
According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two.
BOB ATCHISON WON HIS LAWSUIT AGAINST OMA HAMOU BY COMMITTING THE CRIME OF PERJURY AND FORGERY TO NAME BUT A FEW. THERE IS NOTHING HONORABLE ABOUT THAT. WHO IS THE VICTIM BOB ATCHISON OR OMA HAMOU?
My friend, Oma Hamou has published in her own hand on her own forum some of the alleged debt belonged to her company (s) and not to her. Since Rob Moshein insists this is not true I guess this matter will be addressed in court when it does get to court, I wonder if the court will side with Rob that he is entitled to contact creditors of my friend as if he is a collection agency?
My friend, Oma Hamou has published in her own hand on her own forum some of the alleged debt belonged to her company (s) and not to her. Since Rob Moshein insists this is not true I guess this matter will be addressed in court when it does get to court, I wonder if the court will side with Rob that he is entitled to contact creditors of my friend as if he is a collection agency?
In conclusion, Rob Moshein has used aliases to stalk, harass my friend Oma Hamou since 2003. He stuck his nose into my friend's business affairs, affairs that had absolutely NOTHING to do with him, but he insisted in inserting himself and making all know the lies he and his life partner created about my friend Oma Hamou. Neither Mike Newson or myself or any other person who defends Oma none of us have ever contacted the wine company that hired Rob Moshein and told them what kind of a man this person really is. We have never sent documents to any business associate of Rob Moshein or to the Wine Company that hired him and provides him with the ability to earn a living, we never sent documents from the lawsuit filed by my friend against him yet Rob Moshein has done this and so much more to my friend. When Oma does file her legal pleadings in court against Pallasart, Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein she will be asking the court to grant a PERMANENT protective order against these individuals and entity. She says she isn't asking for money but for the courts to clear her name, right the wrongs that have been done to her by these various individuals and entity and of course maybe refer the case over for criminal prosecution. :-)
I have shown below Rob Moshein publishes untrue statements on the web about my friend Oma Hamou, yet this man says he isn't lying.
When Oma Hamou "does" finally file those many years now long threatened legal pleadings in court, she WILL be served with a Debtor's Exam (Application and Order to Produce Statement of Assets and to Appear for Examination and Judgment Debtor's Statement of Assets) by Bob Atchison's attorney. They will also have a writ of execution and a notice of
ReplyDeletelevy served on any retainer she might pay to her own lawyers, see Cal Code Civ Pro Sections 700.010-700.200. REFUSAL to comply with the Court's orders is called CONTEMPT of Court,specifically 708.120 which reads: If you fail to appear at the time and place specified in this order, you may be subject to arrest and
punishment for contempt of court and the court may make an order
requiring you to pay the reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the
judgment creditor in this proceeding."
she WILL be responsible for ALL of Bob's attorney's fees related to her refusal. I wonder just what a California Court will think of her refusing to pay a lawful judgment against her because she "feels it was fraudulent"?? I know what the Texas Courts will say to her for her refusal to comply with their own orders...she has already been found in contempt of Court here...
First a Brief which is being drafted will go to the courts asking the courts to set aside Bob Atchison's fraudulent judgement.
ReplyDeleteHe will have to file an Answer.
At the same time another brief is being drafted to the courts asking for a permanent injunction against Bob Atchison, Pallasart and Pallasart's people.
At the same time HOPEFULLY criminal charges will be filed against Bob Atchison & Pallasart.
Here is 3 briefs that are being prepared on my friend's behalf and all which will be filed at the same time.
Will they arrest Bob Atchison when criminal charges are filed?
I don't know but I am staying tuned and so is lots of other people.
You have published on the web untruths, false statements about things and Mike and I have pointed it out. You said we could not produce a document, the restraining order document which identifies you as being the person known as Tonya Hoochie, well I did.
Rob research cases related to setting aside judgments -- there are cases out there and well you boast on the web you've got a pal whose a Judge and lots of attorneys who want to assist you so ask one of them.
Remember Rob that just because you say Oma can't successfully set aside the judgement Bob got against her, doesn't mean she can't try or it can't be done.
Why did you Rob stick your nose into Oma's business and personal affairs from 2003 to the present?
Why?
Cat got your tongue?
Justin
Last thing...
ReplyDeleteDo you know about Oma and California Safe At Home Program?
This program was created to protect people like Oma who have been victims of violence, stalking and other related crimes.
And you claim to know everything ABOUT my friend who you say is NOTHING not even a human being that is why you and Bob encourage others to stalk & harass & torment & humilate her.
Can Oma successfully prove you and Pallasart and Bob have done all of this to her - yes!
Justin
Justin, for years you and Mike have said Oma was going to file charges or file briefs but nothing was filed. Why should we believe anything is going to happen this time?
ReplyDeleteYou're right.
ReplyDeleteIn the end it is the decession of Oma not mine or Mike or anyone else. I think Rob and his pals from Pallasart scared her and I think she believed they would leave her alone, go away, but after what 9 years for Bob & Pallasart and 6 years with Rob being involved they didn't leave her alone. You would think they would but not them -- I have read at least 2 drafts of the briefs which are being worked on -- one the setting aside the judgement Bob got and the second the thing in Federal Court about the permanent restraining order. As to Oma filing criminal charges she has met with people who have the power to prosecute Bob for what he's done to her. Do I know if they are going to do this? No and I can't pretend I do. But I can say that I hope they will prosecute him.
Btw, Sandman thanks dude for posting my response to Rob's Update.
Justin
I'm glad Oma is involved with the Safe At Home Program she's got a great case showing Rob and Bob and their people actively look for her, post messages designed to let her know they know where she lives and her family, they stalk her and do all the shit and Rob writes on his blog its fun stuff. No, Mr. Moshein it isn't fun for anyone being stalked by you or your weirdos from the AP crowd. Glad Oma is enrolled in this program, she certainly has proof of being stalked and having the crap beaten out of her by her ex husband. God, I really hope she does find closure to this horrific nightmare she continues to suffer because some creeps in Austin has it in for her.
ReplyDeleteI think its great Oma Hamou is registered with the Safe at Home program in California. One of the great advantages of being in the program is that the California Secretary of State accepts Service of Process on her behalf, so now Process Servers wont have to chase her down personally to serve her with new lawsuits and Debtors Exams and wage andn property garnishments for all the outstanding debts!
ReplyDeleteI sure hope anyone trying to serve her with any legal papers finds this out so that they can so easily get her served now!! I'll bet the folks at Reed Elsevier/Variety will be glad to hear this.
California Safe At Home Program is GREAT for anyone who is a victim of stalking, cyber-bullying, violence of any kind, domestic violence etc.
ReplyDeleteI guess Rob thinks making this kind of statement would scare my friend? Maybe intimidate & humuliate her? That has been the jist of his posts.
ReplyDeleteMaybe it will. I don't know. If it does it isn't because he is telling the truth but that Bob & Rob & Pallasart refuses to leave her alone.
Back in what I think and I could be wrong because it was before I came into Enigma's world, but back in 2002 ENIGMA not Oma contracted services with the advertising company Rob mentions.
They had used this company in the past and had established a rather nice relationship. In fact, anyone who is anyone wanting to get their films notice or pre-sell it in the market uses this company and other related companies.
In letters to people in Russia like to certain government officials BIG BOB ATCHISON the liar of the century writes MANY letters saying the photo of Oma on the cover of this magazine is a fake. That this company Reeds didn't know her and said they have never had her on their cover.
Well of course it was a lie because THE MAGAZINE did have Oma on its cover but this is the kind of lies told by Bob about my friend and her film project.
Anyhow, Enigma did remit more than one payment for the advertising but was unable to pay more the company sued and because it was a legitimate debt Enigma did not contest it. Lots of film companies in LA have done the same thing Enigma has, that is they were unable to pay this company yet these STALKERS of hers, Bob, Rob & Pallasart seem to be saying, no she's different.
Uh-no she isn't and you are an asshole.
My first cuss word used on this comment section, sorry Sandman.
By the time Bob got wind of this debt with this advertising company he and Rob started to contact the attorney who represented it. They told this attorney and others who represented creditors of Enigma's that Oma had paid in excess of $100,000 to sue Bob and suggested they attach her then attorney's retainer fee with respect to Oma. Absolutely every single attorney who they contacted with respect to Enigma/Oma refused to do this.
Now I am certain Rob will make certain Bob makes good on his threat to do this to my friend but I think before that event happens he might be in for a BIG SURPRISE -- like having criminal charges leveled against him.
I don't know I'm just saying.
So NO this advertising company is not GOING after Enigma or Oma. Amex is not going after Oma or Enigma. Others aren't going after Oma or Enigma. I know if and when my friend does SUCCEED in reviving her film project and company she plans to pay everyone that is legitimate except of course Boardrush and Bob Atchison.
Also Rob's statement makes it sound as if Oma has been avoiding process servers for 9 years this is a false, libelous and defamatory statement made about my friend.
I hope people will read further below where Rob claims the restraining order against him didn't identify him as being Tonya Hoochie. It sure does.
Rob and Bob continue to publish lies and say things like the Church calling Oma Satan's Mistress, no the church didn't do this but Bob Atchison in his sick religious mumble jumble HE DID. I guess he thinks it sounds better if he lied and say the church said this not him. Well they didn't say it.
Rob has stalked and harassed my friend for 6 years. You have posted stalking images in order to locate her whereabouts. He claimed he was assisting the Orange County law enforcement in locating her because there was a warrant for her immediate arrest. He was lying then and he keeps on lying. Both him and Bob and Bob's web company keep on lying, harassing and stalking my friend for what 9 years.
One of the GREAT advantages of the Safe At Home program is it protects Oma from you and your ilk.
Justin
New lawsuits?
ReplyDeleteYou mean the one you or Bob will file against her?
Good. Bring It On.
You've stalked my friend for years and called it fun.
Bring It On.
We are ALL waiting who will be the first to file their brief, will it be YOU, will be Bob or will it be OMA or will be law enforcement/prosecutors?
Then and only then will my friend be able to find peace and some sort of closure to this horrific nightmare you and BOB ATCHISON force her to live day in and day out.
Tony
Why Rob you forget you posted Oma's legal address on the web back in 2006 even said you took the time to drive to Burbank to find her, only you found her address was a place she uses to receive mail. You bitched about that why? What were you going to do when you did find her?
ReplyDeleteOma has a right to feel safe in her own home. She has a right as every other person does especially if she has stalkers who live in Austin Texas to secure a mailbox to protect her right to privacy, her right to feel safe at her home.
For years Rob you and Bob have MANIPULATED others to do things to Oma because those people believed you two were telling the truth. For years you and your friends over at the AP Forum have published you knew where she lived, lives and what she is doing in her day to day life and then wonder why she lives in fear of monkeys like you.
Some of the people you two have manipulated have, publicly threatened her and you laughed your ass off, thought it was fun.
I wonder Rob and Bob if the courts and those in places of POWER will agree with you, that what you've done, the destruction of what your lies have caused to happen to OMA if they will agree that you were in the right?
Justin