Bob Atchison Accuses the LAPD & Other Law Enforcement Agenicies of Lying....

How is it that Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein can rise to such heights of artistic creation, moral goodness and personal self-sacrifice, and yet sink to such depths of depravity, moral cruelty and self-centredness?

Tonight on Rob Moshein's Blog his life partner Bob Atchison posted the following statement:

Bob Atchison has left a new comment on the post: "...Some years ago Oma Hamou hired me as a consultant for a movie on a multi-year contract. I was not paid and after three months I cancelled our written agreement. After years of broken promises by Ms. Hamou to pay me for the work I did I filed a lawsuit against Ms. Hamou. I won the lawsuit and was awarded a judgment which has grown to $23,000. The jury decided in my favor 11-1. Oma Hamou has been stated that I lied and forged documents to win the case. This is not true.When we were getting close to our trial date I was contacted by a man from Los Angeles who said he had been offered $15,000 by Hamou and her financial sponsor, Jim Sproul, to go to Austin and make me 'go away' - get rid of me - and thus stop my case against Hamou. This man said it was clear they wanted me killed and volunteered to go to the police.I had never met this man before, I had never heard his name before. The man gave a statement to the police and was interviewed by my Attorney.I will be happy to give more information and contacts on what happened to the DA on this new forgery case if they get in touch with me.Why am I posting this? Anyone who comes against Hamou in any way could be in great danger. Protect yourself and be careful..."

Let's take a look at the Texas court case No: GN303141 Hamou v. Atchison, Pallasart & Moshein. (Excerpts from Mike Newson's Statement on OmaHamou.com 2005, 2006 (c))

Bob Atchison received the below eMail from the "alleged" Hitman's wife a Patricia Lupoli he sent back a reply and requested a telephone number – obviously she provided it to him but we simply don’t know how it happened because Mr. Atchison never provided Oma's attorney with the information. The next communication sent is later that same evening where (again) Bob Atchison selectively ‘cuts & pasts’ from an email sent to him by "Patricia" the alleged hitman's wife.

Reviewing Bob Atchison's phone records it is apparent that from June 17, 2004 at 10:16 AM until 11:25 AM Bob attempted to call Patricia … on 12 separate occasions. As the phone logs show on the 13th attempt, at 11:25 AM, he was successful in making a connection and spoke with someone for approximately 17 minutes. Then it appears he lost the connection and at 11:43 AM reestablished that connection which lasted approximately 27 minutes longer.

Considering the time from the first email to the point at which the police were first called one has to wonder, if this was really a true plot to murder Mr. Atchison, why did it take so long? Mr. Atchison’s phone records reflect that on June 17, 2004 at 12:29 PM he contacted the Austin Police Department who sent out a patrol car to his home. Officer Alfredo Delvalle took Mr. Atchison’s statement at 12:36 PM.

Court records and Bob Atchison's statement to the Austin Police Department, California police department and the FBI were inconsistent concerning his story about Hamou hiring someone to murder him:

One. In letters to friends, Pallasart's Bob Atchison claimed the Austin Police Department called his residence to tell him Oma Hamou had hired someone to murder him. Not true. He called them after receiving an email from the alleged hitman's wife which by the way didn't say Hamou had appraoched them to murder him instead it complained Hamou had conned them out of $20,000 and they were pissed off.

Two. Phone records reveal neither the alleged hit man or his wife called Atchison's residence instead it was Bob who contacted them and together or alone cooked up the murder for hire plot as way to get rid of Hamou. Two people who believed Hamou had done them wrong and thought by cooking up this plan saying she hired someone to murder Bob was a good choice one that would for certain put her in jail by doing so would be doing the world and justice system a favor.

Three. Threats were made to Mike Newson threats which are documented by way of email and other communications between Atchison, the alleged hitman and his wife and Newson all of which are documented in Newson's affidavit to law enforcement including the FBI.

Four. LAW ENFORCEMENT in California and the FBI examined Atchison's phone records which were provided to them by Counsel representing Hamou in her civil case against him, his company and Moshein down in Texas. They examined all the emails including the forged documents Atchison had provided and viewed Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report web site the cut paste job Atchison did to make it appear Hamou was responding to something he sent, verified AOL records which supported the credibility of Oma Hamou, etc. after all this effort the DA and the FBI determined Bob Atchison was lying.

The fact is law enforcement encouraged Hamou to file a criminal complaint against Atchison for this incident but she told by her attorney the matter would be addressed at trial during her lawsuit against these men.

Point to make here, Atchison filed a harassment complaint against Hamou back in 2003 yet he refused to cooperate with the Austin Police Department and published on his/Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report web site a detective Arthur Fortune told him/Rob he believed Hamou was guilty of doing this yet in communications between this detective and Hamou's attorney this officer denied making this kind of statement. Whose lying, Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein or the Austin Police Department?

There was No PLAN TO MURDER OR HURT Bob Atchison, it is a lie if there was a shred of proof, evidence this incident took place law enforcement on both the state and federal level would have taken action. This didn't happen because the evidence proved Atchison made it all up - that is he created the incident believing he was doing the world a favor by once and for all getting rid of Oma Hamou.

Think about it...

Back in 2004 Atchison made a complaint to the FBI, the LAPD and other law enforcement agencies stating as a matter of fact (on record) Hamou had hired someone to murder him the investigation into this charge came back to say, BOB ATCHISON of the Alexander Palace Time Machine website is a lying liar. Atchison and his cohorts insists law enforcement believed his charge of Hamou having hired someone to murder him but they claim the state of Texas (notice no mention of the FBI or LAPD) couldn't do anything about it because of jurisdiction issues, state lines. We've all been told Oma Hamou has filed a criminal complaint against one Bob Atchison, Pallasart and their cohorts with the FBI and one of the things I've been told she wants is for them (FBI) to hold Atchison accountable for this murder for hire scheme that he concocted against her.

A letter between Hamou & Atchison's Attorneys in Case No: GN303141:

Let's examine Bob Atchison's statement about him committing perjury and using forged documents at trial in order to win his lawsuit against Oma Hamou. (Excerpt by Justin Edwards OmaHamou.com)

Bob Atchison under a court order and oath was ordered to produce ALL documents so was his web design company in the course of the Discovery phase of the litigation between Oma and Them. He and Pallasart swore under oath that THEY had provided ALL documents yet we on Oma’s Team knew this was a lie.

For example the Exhibit marked as Plaitiff’s (Atchison) Exhibit C was not a copy of the original invoice given to Oma’s company Enigma by Pallasart and I posted the REAL INVOICE WITH PALLASART'S FAX NUMBER APPEARING AT THE TOP OF THE INVOICE. Bob & his attorney by way of the trial transcript which I’ve posted say another lawsuit in Texas had been filed against Oma’s company and his company this is not true and we’ve shown this by way of posting a copy of the actual page of the trial transcript and the District Clerks Office down there in Texas that validates what Oma has said, no other lawsuit in Texas existed between her company and Bob.

We’ve been hearing Bob has been forwarding documents which have been forwarded to us showing that he’s not lying, well, how come Bob couldn’t produce those documents when the courts asked him too?

I think he made them up because no where in the original documents he provided and the two additional supplemental documents are those documents. So why in the hell didn’t he produce this document then because he was ordered by the court to do so and only now found them – could it be because they didn’t exist in the first place?

Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.

This is a true representation of the the document sent to Enigma from Atchison's, Pallasart Web Venture's on July 13, 2000 a document Pallasart deliberately WITHHELD because IT was protecting its CEO/FOUNDER/PRESIDENT Bob Atchison.

ONE YEAR BEFORE

THE ORIGINAL INVOICE SENT TO ENIGMA BY PALLASART RE: BOB ATCHISON - 2000

Both Bob Atchison and his Then Attorney committed perjury at trial during his lawsuit with Oma Hamou let's read what Bob Atchison's then Attorney had to say to the court Case No: GN303141.

According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two- None, Zilch, Nada.

BOB ATCHISON WON HIS LAWSUIT AGAINST OMA HAMOU BY COMMITTING THE CRIME OF PERJURY AND FORGERY TO NAME BUT A FEW. THERE IS NOTHING HONORABLE ABOUT THAT. WHO IS THE VICTIM BOB ATCHISON OR OMA HAMOU?

During the Trial in court transcripts real documents that a court reporter recorded Bob Atchison says under oath he was never involved in the California case where Oma sued him for defamation etc. well this is a lie because he filed pleadings in Pro Se and when the case got dismissed because the courts in California felt it didn't have the jurisdiction over Bob, Oma hired an attorney which then forced Bob to get someone to represent him.

So, Bob Atchison the man who created the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site lied more than one time under oath in a Texas court room yet those on Pallasart's Forum believe the man's actions against my friend were justified - NO it isn't. A Judge in Texas in her own hand wrote that if a Protective Order wasn’t in place my friend would get hurt and she has because Rob has went on to republish the same words found on Pallasart’s Oma Hamou Report web site to a site that provides a link to Rob’s blogs and both Rob and Bob continue to lie about Oma. And their friends over on the AP site seem to think that Bob and Rob are telling the truth about Oma and she has no right to defend herself against their lies because she owes money and all the rest of the nonsense they’ve said about her.

Well they are wrong. A Judge, Judge Livingston is Texas told Pallasart and Rob Moshein THEY were wrong. Oma has every right to defend herself against these horrible lies and people. A brief is being prepared to be filed in Federal Court against Bob Atchison and Pallasart. Men who hide behind women’s name as Rob did when he registered with Classmates.com as Tonya Hoochie and sent pm’s to Oma pretending he went to the same school, hiding behind a false identity just to terrorize, humiliate and torment my friend are not men but cowards.

Bob Atchison writes on Rob Moshein's Blog: "...What I wrote is the truth. People can judge for themselves who they want to believe..."

Law enforcement & the Courts in Texas believed Oma Hamou was telling the truth over the word of Bob Atchison and Pallasart.